Top 2 Reasons for Motorola MOTO WX260 Compared to Nokia 1616 0.7 mm Thinner than Nokia 1616. Slim mobile phone is easy to handle and looks gorgeous in hand. (107.6 x 45.3 x 14.30 mm vs. 107.1 x 45 x 15 mm) 1.8% Higher pixel density than Nokia 1616. High pixel density shows sharper text and extremely detailed photos and videos. (116 ppi vs. 114 ppi) |
Top 3 Reasons for Nokia 1616 Compared to Motorola MOTO WX260 6.7% more mAH battery than Nokia 1616. More battery capacity reduces the need to charge your battery again. (800 mAH, Li-ion vs. 750 mAH, Li-ion) 4.5 grams Lighter than Nokia 1616. light weight phone is easy to hold and can kept in your pocket for long time. (78.55 grams vs. 83 grams) 1.7% bigger screen size than Nokia 1616. The bigger the screen size is better the user experience of reading and watching movie or video songs. (1.80 Inch vs. 1.77 Inch) |