> > Motorola MOTO WX260 vs. Micromax X265

Compare Motorola MOTO WX260 vs. Micromax X265

Motorola MOTO WX260
 		VS
Micromax X265
VS
Best Price
Price Rs. 990.00 Rs. 1,999.00
Battery
Capacity 750 mAH, Li-ion 1200 mAH, Li-ion

60.0% more mAH battery than Micromax X265. More battery capacity reduces the need to charge your battery again. (1200 mAH, Li-ion vs. 750 mAH, Li-ion)
TalkTime Up to 8 Hours(2G) Up to 6 Hours(2G)
Camera
Main Camera No 0.3 MP
Camera Features Smile detection, White balance presets, Multi Shot Smile detection, White balance presets, Multi Shot
Connectivity
GPRS Class 10, 32 - 48 kbps kbps Yes
EDGE No No
Bluetooth v2.0 Yes
USB Connectivity No USB Port
Design
Weight 83 grams

12.0 grams Lighter than Micromax X265. light weight phone is easy to hold and can kept in your pocket for long time. (83 grams vs. 95 grams)

 95 grams
Dimensions 107.6 x 45.3 x 14.30 mm

0.4 mm Thinner than Micromax X265. Slim mobile phone is easy to handle and looks gorgeous in hand. (107.6 x 45.3 x 14.30 mm vs. 113.7 x 50 x 14.70 mm)

 113.7 x 50 x 14.70 mm
Screen Size 1.77 Inch 2.2 Inch

24.3% bigger screen size than Micromax X265. The bigger the screen size is better the user experience of reading and watching movie or video songs. (2.2 Inch vs. 1.77 Inch)
Colours Black Black with Green
Display
Screen Resolution 128 x 160 pixels 176 x 220 pixels
Pixel Density (sharpness) 116 ppi 128 ppi

10.3% Higher pixel density than Micromax X265. High pixel density shows sharper text and extremely detailed photos and videos. (128 ppi vs. 116 ppi)
Display Type LCD
Features
Box Contents Handset, Charger, Battery, Earphone, Warranty Card, User Guide, USB Cable Transreceiver, Standard Charger, Standard Battery, Handsfree Kit, Data Cable, User Guide, Service Guide, Warranty Card
General
Brand Motorola Micromax
Model WX260 X265
SIM Slot(s) Single SIM, GSM Dual SIM, GSM+GSM
Multimedia
FM Radio Stereo FM, RDS Stereo FM, Internal antenna
Storage
Expandable Memory Up to 2 GB Up to 8 GB
Price Comparison

Compare Price

Compare Price

Others Related Comparisons