> > Motorola MOTO WX260 vs. Nokia 106

Compare Motorola MOTO WX260 vs. Nokia 106

Motorola MOTO WX260
VS
Nokia 106
VS
Best Price
Price Rs. 990.00 Rs. 1,295.00
Battery
Capacity 750 mAH, Li-ion 800 mAH, Li-ion

6.7% more mAH battery than Nokia 106. More battery capacity reduces the need to charge your battery again. (800 mAH, Li-ion vs. 750 mAH, Li-ion)

TalkTime Up to 8 Hours(2G) Up to 9.9 Hours(2G)
Stand By Time Up to 840 Hours(2G)
Camera
Main Camera No No
Camera Features Smile detection, White balance presets, Multi Shot
Connectivity
Operating Frequency GSM 1800 / 900 MHz
GPRS Class 10, 32 - 48 kbps kbps No
EDGE No No
Bluetooth v2.0 No
USB Connectivity No USB Port, USB charging
Design
Weight 83 grams 74.2 grams

8.8 grams Lighter than Nokia 106. light weight phone is easy to hold and can kept in your pocket for long time. (74.2 grams vs. 83 grams)

Dimensions 107.6 x 45.3 x 14.30 mm

0.6 mm Thinner than Nokia 106. Slim mobile phone is easy to handle and looks gorgeous in hand. (107.6 x 45.3 x 14.30 mm vs. 112.9 x 47.5 x 14.9 mm)

112.9 x 47.5 x 14.9 mm
Screen Size 1.77 Inch 1.8 Inch

1.7% bigger screen size than Nokia 106. The bigger the screen size is better the user experience of reading and watching movie or video songs. (1.8 Inch vs. 1.77 Inch)

Colours Black Black,Red,White
Display
Screen Resolution 128 x 160 pixels 128 x 160 pixels
Pixel Density (sharpness) 116 ppi

1.8% Higher pixel density than Nokia 106. High pixel density shows sharper text and extremely detailed photos and videos. (116 ppi vs. 114 ppi)

114 ppi
Display Type LCD LCD
Features
Box Contents Handset, Charger, Battery, Earphone, Warranty Card, User Guide, USB Cable Nokia 106, Nokia Charger AC-11, Nokia Battery BL-5CB, Product user guide, Warranty card
General
Brand Motorola Nokia
Model WX260 106
SIM Slot(s) Single SIM, GSM Single SIM, GSM
SIM Size Mini
Multimedia
Loudspeaker Yes
Audio Jack 3.5 mm
FM Radio Stereo FM, RDS Yes
Performance
RAM 384 KB
Storage
Expandable Memory Up to 2 GB
Price Comparison

Compare Price

Compare Price

Others Related Comparisons