> > Vertu Ascent TI Ferrari vs. Micromax X332

Compare Vertu Ascent TI Ferrari vs. Micromax X332

Vertu Ascent TI Ferrari
VS
Micromax X332
VS
Best Price
Price Not Available Not Available
Battery
Capacity 950 mAH, Li-ion

35.7% more mAH battery than Micromax X332. More battery capacity reduces the need to charge your battery again. (950 mAH, Li-ion vs. 700 mAH, Li-ion)

700 mAH, Li-ion
TalkTime Up to 5 Hours(2G) Up to 3 Hours(2G)
Camera
Main Camera 3 MP, Auto focus

50.0% more mega pixels (MP) on main camera than Micromax X332. More main camera resolution means better picture quality and detailed photos, which will look sharp on a large screen. (3 MP, Auto focus vs. 2 MP)

2 MP
Flash ,LED
Video Recording Recording Formats: MPEG-4, 3GP, AVI Recording Formats: 3GP, AVI
Zoom Digital Zoom Digital Zoom
Camera Features Effects, Multi Shot CMOS image sensor, Effects, Multi Shot
Connectivity
GPRS Yes Yes
EDGE No No
Bluetooth Yes
USB Connectivity USB Port No
Design
Weight 160 grams 82 grams

78.0 grams Lighter than Micromax X332. light weight phone is easy to hold and can kept in your pocket for long time. (82 grams vs. 160 grams)

Dimensions 115.5 x 49 x 18 mm 109 x 50 x 14.50 mm

3.5 mm Thinner than Micromax X332. Slim mobile phone is easy to handle and looks gorgeous in hand. (109 x 50 x 14.50 mm vs. 115.5 x 49 x 18 mm)

Screen Size 2.4 Inch
Display
Pixel Density (sharpness) 167 ppi
Display Type LCD
Screen Resolution 240 x 320 pixels 240 x 320 pixels
Features
Box Contents Handset, User Guide, Service Guide, CD, Charger, USB Cable
General
Brand Vertu Micromax
Model Ascent Ti Ferrari X332
SIM Slot(s) Single SIM, GSM Single SIM, GSM
Storage
Internal Memory 4 GB
Expandable Memory Up to 2 GB
Price Comparison

Compare Price

Compare Price