> > Sony Ericsson W302i vs. Lava Iris 406q

Compare Sony Ericsson W302i vs. Lava Iris 406q

Sony Ericsson W302i
 		VS
Lava Iris 406q
VS
Best Price
Price Not Available Rs. 4,199.00
Battery
TalkTime Up to 7 Hours(2G)
Stand By Time Up to 168 Hours(2G)
Capacity 1700 mAH, Li-ion
Camera
Front Camera 0.3 MP
Flash LED
Camera Features High Dynamic Range mode (HDR)
Main Camera 2 MP 5 MP

150.0% more mega pixels (MP) on main camera than Lava Iris 406q. More main camera resolution means better picture quality and detailed photos, which will look sharp on a large screen. (5 MP vs. 2 MP)
Video Recording 220x176 @ 15 1280x720 fps
Zoom Digital Zoom Digital Zoom, 4 x
Connectivity
GPRS Class 10, 32 - 48 kbps kbps Yes
EDGE Class 10, 236.8 kbps Yes
Bluetooth v2.0, A2DP v4.0, A2DP
USB Connectivity USB Port USB Port, microUSB 2.0
More Connectivity Tethering
Operating Frequency GSM 1800 / 1900 / 850 / 900 MHz UMTS 2100 MHz | GSM 1800 / 1900 / 850 / 900 MHz
3G HSDPA 21.1 Mbit/s, HSUPA 5.76 Mbit/s
Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 802.11, b/g/n, Mobile Hotspot
Design
Screen Size 4.0 Inch
Touch Screen Capacitive Touchscreen, Multi-touch
Colours Black,White
Weight 78 grams
Dimensions 100 x 46 x 10.50 mm 124 x 64 x 10.3 mm

0.2 mm Thinner than Lava Iris 406q. Slim mobile phone is easy to handle and looks gorgeous in hand. (124 x 64 x 10.3 mm vs. 100 x 46 x 10.50 mm)
Display
Screen Resolution 220 x 220 pixels, 2.0 inches pixels 480 x 800 pixels
Display Type LCD LCD
Pixel Density (sharpness) 233 ppi
Features
Box Contents Handset, Battery, Charger, Earphone, USB Cable, User Manual, Warranty Card
GPS with A-GPS
Sensors Accelerometer, Proximity sensor
General
OS Type Android
Brand Sony Ericsson Lava
Model W302i Iris 406q
SIM Slot(s) Single SIM, GSM Dual SIM, GSM+GSM
Operating System Android v4.3 (Jelly Bean)
Multimedia
FM Radio Yes Recording option
Loudspeaker Yes
Audio Jack 3.5 mm
Performance
Processor Quad core, 1.2 GHz
RAM 1 GB
Storage
Internal Memory 20 MB 4 GB
Expandable Memory memoryCardtype Up to 32 GB
Price Comparison

Compare Price

Compare Price

Others Related Comparisons