> > Simoco Mobile SM 242 vs. Micromax Q35

Compare Simoco Mobile SM 242 vs. Micromax Q35

Simoco Mobile SM 242
VS
Micromax Q35
VS
Best Price
Price Not Available Rs. 3,220.00
Battery
Capacity 1600 mAH, Li-ion

52.4% more mAH battery than Micromax Q35. More battery capacity reduces the need to charge your battery again. (1600 mAH, Li-ion vs. 1050 mAH, Li-ion)

1050 mAH, Li-ion
TalkTime Up to 6.5 Hours(2G) Up to 4.5 Hours(2G)
Camera
Main Camera No 0.3 MP
Camera Features Effects, Multi Shot Smile detection, Scenes, Continuos Shooting, Multi Shot
Video Recording Recording Formats: 3GP
Zoom Digital Zoom
Connectivity
GPRS Yes Yes
EDGE No No
3G No
Bluetooth No Yes
USB Connectivity No USB Port
Design
Weight 85 grams

21.0 grams Lighter than Micromax Q35. light weight phone is easy to hold and can kept in your pocket for long time. (85 grams vs. 106 grams)

106 grams
Dimensions 110 x 45 x 15 mm 111 x 58 x 13 mm

2.0 mm Thinner than Micromax Q35. Slim mobile phone is easy to handle and looks gorgeous in hand. (111 x 58 x 13 mm vs. 110 x 45 x 15 mm)

Screen Size 1.80 Inch 2.20 Inch

22.2% bigger screen size than Micromax Q35. The bigger the screen size is better the user experience of reading and watching movie or video songs. (2.20 Inch vs. 1.80 Inch)

Colours Black
Display
Display Type LCD
Screen Resolution 128 x 160 pixels 240 x 320 pixels
Pixel Density (sharpness) 114 ppi 182 ppi

59.6% Higher pixel density than Micromax Q35. High pixel density shows sharper text and extremely detailed photos and videos. (182 ppi vs. 114 ppi)

Features
Box Contents Mobile, Charger, Battery, Stereo Headset, Warranty Card, User Guide. Transceiver, Standard Battery, Standard Charger, Handsfree, USB Cable, Service Guide, Warranty Card
General
Brand Simoco Mobile Micromax
Model SM 242 Q35
SIM Slot(s) Single SIM, GSM Dual SIM, GSM+GSM
Multimedia
FM Radio Yes Yes
Storage
Expandable Memory Yes Up to 8 GB
Price Comparison

Compare Price

Compare Price

Others Related Comparisons