> > Samsung Galaxy Note 3 Duos vs. HTC Desire 816

Compare Samsung Galaxy Note 3 Duos vs. HTC Desire 816

Samsung Galaxy Note 3 Duos
VS
HTC Desire 816
VS
Best Price
Price Not Available Rs. 18,799.00
Battery
Capacity 3200 mAH, Li-ion

23.1% more mAH battery than HTC Desire 816. More battery capacity reduces the need to charge your battery again. (3200 mAH, Li-ion vs. 2600 mAH, Li-Po, Non-removable)

2600 mAH, Li-Po, Non-removable
TalkTime Up to 20 Hours(3G) Up to 21 Hours(3G)
Stand By Time Up to 490 Hours(3G) Up to 614 Hours(3G)
Camera
Main Camera 13 MP, Auto focus 13 MP, Auto focus
Front Camera 2 MP 5 MP

150.0% more mega pixels (MP) on front camera than HTC Desire 816. More front camera resolution means better selfies picture. Front facing cameras also used for video call on Skype (5 MP vs. 2 MP)

Flash LED LED
Video Recording 4k @ 30 FPS, Full HD @ 60 FPS Full HD @ 30 FPS, Recording Formats: MP4, High Dynamic Range mode (HDR)
Zoom Digital Zoom Digital Zoom
Camera Features Digital image stabilization, Dual Shot, Effects, Face detection, Geo tagging, High Dynamic Range mode (HDR), Simultaneous HD video and image recording, Smile detection, Touch to focus Back-illuminated sensor (BSI)
Connectivity
Operating Frequency GSM 1800 / 1900 / 850 / 900 MHz UMTS 1900 / 2100 / 850 / 900 MHz | GSM 1800 / 1900 / 850 / 900 MHz GSM 1800 / 1900 / 850 / 900 MHz UMTS 2100 / 850 / 900 MHz | GSM 1800 / 1900 / 850 / 900 MHz
GPRS Yes Yes
EDGE Yes Yes
3G HSDPA 42.2 Mbit/s, HSUPA 5.76 Mbit/s HSDPA 14.4 Mbit/s, HSUPA 5.76 Mbit/s
Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 802.11, a/ac/b/g/n, Dual antennas, Mobile Hotspot, Wi-Fi Direct Wi-Fi 802.11, b/g/n, Mobile Hotspot
Bluetooth v4.0, EDR, A2DP, AVRCP, HFP, HID, HSP, MAP, OPP, PAN, PBAP, Proximity Monitor Profile over LE, SAP v4.0, A2DP
USB Connectivity USB Port, USB 3.0, USB Host, microUSB USB Port, USB On-The-Go, microUSB 2.0
More Connectivity TV-Out DLNA
USB OTG Support Yes
Design
Colours Black,Blue,Pink,Red,White Gray,Orange,White
Touch Screen Capacitive Touchscreen, Multi-touch Capacitive Touchscreen, Multi-touch
Weight 168 grams 165 grams

3.0 grams Lighter than HTC Desire 816. light weight phone is easy to hold and can kept in your pocket for long time. (165 grams vs. 168 grams)

Dimensions 151.2 x 79.2 x 8.3 mm 156.6 x 78.7 x 8 mm

0.3 mm Thinner than HTC Desire 816. Slim mobile phone is easy to handle and looks gorgeous in hand. (156.6 x 78.7 x 8 mm vs. 151.2 x 79.2 x 8.3 mm)

Screen Size 5.7 Inch

3.6% bigger screen size than HTC Desire 816. The bigger the screen size is better the user experience of reading and watching movie or video songs. (5.7 Inch vs. 5.5 Inch)

5.5 Inch
Display
Screen Resolution Full HD (1080 x 1920 pixels) HD (720 x 1280 pixels)
Pixel Density (sharpness) 386 ppi

44.6% Higher pixel density than HTC Desire 816. High pixel density shows sharper text and extremely detailed photos and videos. (386 ppi vs. 267 ppi)

267 ppi
Display Type Super AMOLED S-LCD 2
Graphics Adreno 330 Adreno 305
Features
Stylus Yes
Sensors Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Humidity Sensor, IR Gesture, Proximity sensor, Thermometer Accelerometer, Light sensor, Proximity sensor
GPS with A-GPS, Glonass with A-GPS, Glonass
Box Contents Handset, Battery, Charger, Earphone, USB Cable, User Manual, Warranty Card Handset with built-in Battery, Charger, Earphone, USB Cable, User Manual, Warranty Card
General
OS Type Android Android
Brand Samsung HTC
Model Galaxy Note 3 Duos Desire 816
Operating System Android v4.3 (Jelly Bean) Android v4.4.2 (KitKat)
SIM Slot(s) Dual SIM, GSM+GSM Dual SIM, GSM+GSM
SIM Size Micro Nano
Multimedia
FM Radio RDS, Stereo FM
Loudspeaker Yes Yes
Audio Jack 3.5 mm 3.5 mm
Performance
RAM 3 GB

100.0% More RAM memory than HTC Desire 816. more RAM makes your mobile significantly faster and efficient. (3 GB vs. 1.5 GB)

1.5 GB
Processor Quad core, 2.3 GHz, Krait 400, Chipset: Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 Quad core, 1.6 GHz, Cortex A7, Chipset: Qualcomm Snapdragon 400
Storage
Internal Memory 16 GB 8 GB
Expandable Memory Up to 64 GB Up to 128 GB
Price Comparison

Compare Price

Compare Price

Others Related Comparisons