> > Samsung Galaxy Mega 5.8 I9152 vs. Samsung Galaxy Neo

Compare Samsung Galaxy Mega 5.8 I9152 vs. Samsung Galaxy Neo

Samsung Galaxy Mega 5.8 I9152
VS
Samsung Galaxy Neo
VS
Best Price
Price Rs. 14,444.00 Rs. 8,027.00
Battery
Capacity 2600 mAH, Li-ion

23.8% more mAH battery than Samsung Galaxy Neo. More battery capacity reduces the need to charge your battery again. (2600 mAH, Li-ion vs. 2100 mAH, Li-ion)

2100 mAH, Li-ion
TalkTime Up to 12 Hours(3G) Up to 11 Hours(3G)
Stand By Time Up to 440(3G) Up to 430 Hours(3G)
Camera
Main Camera 8 MP, Auto focus

60.0% more mega pixels (MP) on main camera than Samsung Galaxy Neo. More main camera resolution means better picture quality and detailed photos, which will look sharp on a large screen. (8 MP, Auto focus vs. 5 MP, Auto focus)

5 MP, Auto focus
Front Camera 1.90 MP

533.3% more mega pixels (MP) on front camera than Samsung Galaxy Neo. More front camera resolution means better selfies picture. Front facing cameras also used for video call on Skype (1.90 MP vs. 0.3 MP)

0.3 MP
Flash LED LED
Video Recording Full HD @ 30 FPS HD @ 30 FPS
Zoom Digital Zoom, 4.0 x Digital Zoom
Camera Features Auto Focus Auto Focus
Connectivity
Operating Frequency GSM 1800 / 1900 / 850 / 900 MHz UMTS 1900 / 2100 / 850 / 900 MHz | GSM 1800 / 1900 / 850 / 900 MHz GSM 1800 / 1900 / 850 / 900 MHz UMTS 2100 / 900 MHz | GSM 1800 / 1900 / 850 / 900 MHz
GPRS Yes Yes
EDGE Yes Yes
3G HSDPA 21 Mbit/s, HSUPA 5.76 Mbit/s HSDPA 21 Mbit/s, HSUPA 5.76 Mbit/s
USB Connectivity USB Port, microUSB 2.0 USB Port, Mass storage device, USB charging, microUSB 2.0
More Connectivity DLNA Computer sync, DLNA, OTA sync, Tethering
Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 802.11, a/b/g/n, Dual antennas, Mobile Hotspot, Wi-Fi Direct Wi-Fi 802.11, b/g/n, Dual antennas, Mobile Hotspot, Wi-Fi Direct
Bluetooth v4, A2DP, AVRCP, GAP, HFP, HID, OPP, PBAP, Proximity Monitor Profile over LE, SAP, SPP v4.0, A2DP, AVRCP, BLE, HFP, HID, HSP, OPP, PAN, PBAP, Proximity Monitor Profile over LE, SAP
Design
Colours Black,White Black,White
Touch Screen Capacitive Touchscreen, Multi-touch Capacitive Touchscreen, Multi-touch
Weight 182 grams 163 grams

19.0 grams Lighter than Samsung Galaxy Neo. light weight phone is easy to hold and can kept in your pocket for long time. (163 grams vs. 182 grams)

Dimensions 162.6 x 82.4 x 8.99 mm

0.6 mm Thinner than Samsung Galaxy Neo. Slim mobile phone is easy to handle and looks gorgeous in hand. (162.6 x 82.4 x 8.99 mm vs. 143.7 x 77.1 x 9.6 mm)

143.7 x 77.1 x 9.6 mm
Screen Size 5.80 Inch

16.0% bigger screen size than Samsung Galaxy Neo. The bigger the screen size is better the user experience of reading and watching movie or video songs. (5.80 Inch vs. 5.0 Inch)

5.0 Inch
Display
Screen Resolution 540 x 960 pixels 480 x 800 pixels
Pixel Density (sharpness) 190 ppi

1.6% Higher pixel density than Samsung Galaxy Neo. High pixel density shows sharper text and extremely detailed photos and videos. (190 ppi vs. 187 ppi)

187 ppi
Display Type TFT TFT
Graphics VideoCore IV
Features
GPS with A-GPS with A-GPS
Box Contents Handset, Battery, Charger, Earphone, USB Cable, User Manual, Warranty Card Handset, Battery, Charger, Earphone, USB Cable, User Manual, Warranty Card
Sensors Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light sensor, Proximity sensor Accelerometer, Compass, Light sensor, Proximity sensor
General
Brand Samsung Samsung
Model Galaxy Mega 5.8 I9152 Galaxy Grand Neo
Operating System Android v4.2.2 (Jelly Bean) Android v4.3 (Jelly Bean)
SIM Slot(s) Dual SIM, GSM+GSM Dual SIM, GSM+GSM
SIM Size Micro Mini
OS Type Android Android
Also Known As Samsung Galaxy Grand Lite, Samsung GT-I9060
Multimedia
FM Radio No Yes
Loudspeaker Yes Yes
Audio Jack 3.5 mm 3.5 mm
Performance
Processor Dual core, 1.4 GHz, Cortex A9 Quad core, 1.2 GHz, Cortex A7, Chipset: Broadcom BCM23550
RAM 1.50 GB

50.0% More RAM memory than Samsung Galaxy Neo. more RAM makes your mobile significantly faster and efficient. (1.50 GB vs. 1 GB)

1 GB
Storage
Internal Memory 8 GB 8 GB
Expandable Memory Up to 64 GB Up to 64 GB
Price Comparison

Compare Price

Compare Price

Others Related Comparisons