> > RoverPC E5 vs. Micromax Q3 ezpad

Compare RoverPC E5 vs. Micromax Q3 ezpad

RoverPC E5
 		VS
Micromax Q3 ezpad
VS
Best Price
Price Not Available Not Available
Battery
TalkTime Up to 4 Hours(2G) Up to 4 Hours(2G)
Stand By Time Up to 4 Hours(2G) Up to 4 Hours(2G)
Capacity 1000 mAH, Li-ion
Camera
Camera Features Effects, Multi Shot
Main Camera 2 MP

53.8% more mega pixels (MP) on main camera than Micromax Q3 ezpad. More main camera resolution means better picture quality and detailed photos, which will look sharp on a large screen. (2 MP vs. 1.3 MP)

 1.3 MP
Zoom Digital Zoom Digital Zoom
Connectivity
GPRS Yes Class 10, 32 - 48 kbps kbps
EDGE No No
Bluetooth Yes
USB Connectivity No USB Port
Design
Weight 108 grams 97 grams

11.0 grams Lighter than Micromax Q3 ezpad. light weight phone is easy to hold and can kept in your pocket for long time. (97 grams vs. 108 grams)
Dimensions 111.80 x 60.50 x 15.80 mm 111.2 x 61.2 x 13 mm

2.8 mm Thinner than Micromax Q3 ezpad. Slim mobile phone is easy to handle and looks gorgeous in hand. (111.2 x 61.2 x 13 mm vs. 111.80 x 60.50 x 15.80 mm)
Screen Size 2.20 Inch 2.2 Inch
Colours Black
Display
Screen Resolution 320 x 320 pixels, 2.2 inches pixels 176 x 220 pixels
Pixel Density (sharpness) 206 ppi

60.9% Higher pixel density than Micromax Q3 ezpad. High pixel density shows sharper text and extremely detailed photos and videos. (206 ppi vs. 128 ppi)

 128 ppi
Display Type LCD LCD
Features
Box Contents Transceiver, Standard Charger, Standard Battery, Handsfree Kit, Leather Pouch, Service Guide, User Guide, Warranty Card
General
OS Type Windows
Brand RoverPC Micromax
Model E5 Q3 ezpad
Operating System Windows Mobile
SIM Slot(s) Single SIM, GSM Dual SIM, GSM+GSM
Multimedia
FM Radio Yes Stereo FM, Recording option
Performance
RAM 64 MB
Storage
Internal Memory 128 MB 10 MB
Expandable Memory Yes Up to 2 GB
Price Comparison

Compare Price

Compare Price