> > Pine Polo vs. Micromax A34

Compare Pine Polo vs. Micromax A34

Pine Polo
 		VS
Micromax A34
VS
Best Price
Price Not Available Rs. 3,207.00
Battery
Capacity 1000 mAH, Li-ion 1350 mAH, Li-ion

35.0% more mAH battery than Micromax A34. More battery capacity reduces the need to charge your battery again. (1350 mAH, Li-ion vs. 1000 mAH, Li-ion)
TalkTime Up to 7 Hours(2G) Up to 4 Hours(2G)
Stand By Time Up to 168 Hours(2G) Up to 120 Hours(2G)
Camera
Main Camera 2 MP 2 MP
Zoom Digital Zoom Digital Zoom
Camera Features Smile detection, White balance presets, Multi Shot
Flash LED
Connectivity
Operating Frequency GSM 1800 / 900 MHz | GSM 1800 / 900 MHz
Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 802.11, b/g/n, Mobile Hotspot
GPRS Class 12 Yes
EDGE Class 12 Yes
Bluetooth Yes v2.1, A2DP, OPP
USB Connectivity USB Port USB Port, microUSB 2.0
Design
Touch Screen Yes Capacitive Touchscreen, Multi-touch
Dimensions 107 x 51 x 14.50 mm 121 x 67.2 x 12.25 mm

2.3 mm Thinner than Micromax A34. Slim mobile phone is easy to handle and looks gorgeous in hand. (121 x 67.2 x 12.25 mm vs. 107 x 51 x 14.50 mm)
Screen Size 2.8 Inch 3.9 Inch

39.3% bigger screen size than Micromax A34. The bigger the screen size is better the user experience of reading and watching movie or video songs. (3.9 Inch vs. 2.8 Inch)
Weight 85 grams
Colours Black Black,White
Display
Screen Resolution 320 x 480 pixels
Pixel Density (sharpness) 148 ppi
Display Type LCD TFT
Features
Box Contents Handset, Battery, Headset, Travel Charger, USB cable, CD, Warranty Card Handset, Battery, Charger, Earphone, USB Cable, User Manual, Warranty Card
Sensors Accelerometer, Light sensor
General
Operating System Android v2.3.5 (Gingerbread)
SIM Size Mini
OS Type Android
Brand Pine Micromax
Model Polo A34
SIM Slot(s) Dual SIM, GSM+GSM Dual SIM, GSM+GSM
Multimedia
FM Radio Yes Yes
Loudspeaker Yes
Audio Jack 3.5 mm
Performance
Processor Dual core, 1 GHz, Chipset: SC6820
RAM 256 MB
Storage
Internal Memory 58 MB 512 MB
Expandable Memory Up to 32 GB Up to 32 GB
Price Comparison

Compare Price

Compare Price