> > O2 Xphone IIm vs. Karbonn A9 Plus

Compare O2 Xphone IIm vs. Karbonn A9 Plus

O2 Xphone IIm
 		VS
Karbonn A9 Plus
VS
Best Price
Price Not Available Rs. 6,224.00
Battery
TalkTime Up to 4 Hours(2G) Up to 4 Hours(2G)
Stand By Time Up to 4 Hours(2G) Up to 4(2G)
Capacity 1420 mAH, Li-ion
Camera
Front Camera 1.30 MP
Flash LED
Video Recording 1280x72
Camera Features Auto Focus
Main Camera 0.3 MP 5 MP, Auto focus

1,566.7% more mega pixels (MP) on main camera than Karbonn A9 Plus. More main camera resolution means better picture quality and detailed photos, which will look sharp on a large screen. (5 MP, Auto focus vs. 0.3 MP)
Zoom Digital Zoom Digital Zoom
Connectivity
GPRS Class 10, 32 - 48 kbps kbps Yes
EDGE No Yes
Bluetooth v1.1 Yes
USB Connectivity USB Port USB Port
More Connectivity VoIP, Infrared VoIP
3G HSPA , EV-DO , Rev.A
Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 802.11, b/g/n, Mobile Hotspot
Design
Touch Screen Capacitive Touchscreen
Colours Pearl White
Screen Size 4 Inch
Weight 138 grams 105 grams

33.0 grams Lighter than Karbonn A9 Plus. light weight phone is easy to hold and can kept in your pocket for long time. (105 grams vs. 138 grams)
Dimensions 107 x 47 x 19 mm 120 x 60.5 x 11.3 mm

7.7 mm Thinner than Karbonn A9 Plus. Slim mobile phone is easy to handle and looks gorgeous in hand. (120 x 60.5 x 11.3 mm vs. 107 x 47 x 19 mm)
Display
Screen Resolution 220 x 220 pixels, 2.2 inches, 35 X 44 mm pixels 800 x 480 pixels
Display Type LCD IPS LCD
Pixel Density (sharpness) 233 ppi
Features
Box Contents Handset, Battery, Charger, Earphone, USB Cable, User Manual, Warranty Card
Sensors Accelerometer, Proximity sensor, Compass, Light sensor
GPS with A-GPS
General
OS Type Android
Brand O2 Karbonn
Model Xphone IIm A9 Plus
SIM Slot(s) Single SIM, GSM Dual SIM, GSM+GSM
Operating System Android v4 (Ice Cream Sandwich)
Multimedia
FM Radio Stereo FM
Performance
Processor Dual core, 1.2 GHz, Qualcomm
RAM 512 MB
Storage
Internal Memory 32 MB 4 GB
Expandable Memory memoryCardtype Up to 32 GB
Price Comparison

Compare Price

Compare Price

Others Related Comparisons