Top 1 Reasons for Nokia 2600 Classic Compared to Sigmatel FXD S400 5.5 mm Thinner than Sigmatel FXD S400. Slim mobile phone is easy to handle and looks gorgeous in hand. (109.6 x 46.7 x 12 mm vs. 117.5 x 54.5 x 17.50 mm) |
Top 3 Reasons for Sigmatel FXD S400 Compared to Nokia 2600 Classic 566.7% more mega pixels (MP) on main camera than Sigmatel FXD S400. More main camera resolution means better picture quality and detailed photos, which will look sharp on a large screen. (2 MP vs. 0.3 MP) 35.6% bigger screen size than Sigmatel FXD S400. The bigger the screen size is better the user experience of reading and watching movie or video songs. (2.4 Inch vs. 1.77 Inch) 44.0% Higher pixel density than Sigmatel FXD S400. High pixel density shows sharper text and extremely detailed photos and videos. (167 ppi vs. 116 ppi) |