Top 1 Reasons for Nokia 1650 Compared to Micromax Q4 2.0% more mAH battery than Micromax Q4. More battery capacity reduces the need to charge your battery again. (1020 mAH, Li-ion vs. 1000 mAH, Li-ion) |
Top 3 Reasons for Micromax Q4 Compared to Nokia 1650 4.8 mm Thinner than Micromax Q4. Slim mobile phone is easy to handle and looks gorgeous in hand. (111.2 x 61.2 x 13 mm vs. 104.2 x 43.8 x 17.80 mm) 22.2% bigger screen size than Micromax Q4. The bigger the screen size is better the user experience of reading and watching movie or video songs. (2.2 Inch vs. 1.8 Inch) 12.3% Higher pixel density than Micromax Q4. High pixel density shows sharper text and extremely detailed photos and videos. (128 ppi vs. 114 ppi) |