> > Nokia 1600 vs. Micromax Q3 ezpad

Compare Nokia 1600 vs. Micromax Q3 ezpad

Nokia 1600
 		VS
Micromax Q3 ezpad
VS
Best Price
Price Not Available Not Available
Battery
TalkTime Up to 5.5 Hours(2G) Up to 4 Hours(2G)
Capacity 1000 mAH, Li-ion
Stand By Time Up to 4 Hours(2G)
Camera
Zoom Digital Zoom
Camera Features Effects, Multi Shot
Main Camera No 1.3 MP
Connectivity
GPRS No Class 10, 32 - 48 kbps kbps
EDGE No No
Bluetooth No
USB Connectivity No USB Port
Design
Weight 85 grams

12.0 grams Lighter than Micromax Q3 ezpad. light weight phone is easy to hold and can kept in your pocket for long time. (85 grams vs. 97 grams)

 97 grams
Dimensions 104.20 x 44.70 x 17.10 mm 111.2 x 61.2 x 13 mm

4.1 mm Thinner than Micromax Q3 ezpad. Slim mobile phone is easy to handle and looks gorgeous in hand. (111.2 x 61.2 x 13 mm vs. 104.20 x 44.70 x 17.10 mm)
Screen Size 2.2 Inch
Colours Black
Display
Pixel Density (sharpness) 128 ppi
Display Type LCD
Screen Resolution 68 x 68 pixels 176 x 220 pixels
Features
Box Contents Transceiver, Standard Charger, Standard Battery, Handsfree Kit, Leather Pouch, Service Guide, User Guide, Warranty Card
General
Brand Nokia Micromax
Model 1600 Q3 ezpad
SIM Slot(s) Single SIM, GSM Dual SIM, GSM+GSM
Multimedia
FM Radio Stereo FM, Recording option
Storage
Internal Memory 4 MB 10 MB
Expandable Memory No Up to 2 GB
Price Comparison

Compare Price

Compare Price

Others Related Comparisons