Top 2 Reasons for MTS CG131 Compared to Micromax X367 11.1% more mAH battery than Micromax X367. More battery capacity reduces the need to charge your battery again. (1000 mAH, Li-ion vs. 900 mAH, Li-ion) 16.8% Higher pixel density than Micromax X367. High pixel density shows sharper text and extremely detailed photos and videos. (167 ppi vs. 143 ppi) |
Top 2 Reasons for Micromax X367 Compared to MTS CG131 2.8 mm Thinner than Micromax X367. Slim mobile phone is easy to handle and looks gorgeous in hand. (107 x 58 x 11 mm vs. 116.82 x 49.4 x 13.8 mm) 16.7% bigger screen size than Micromax X367. The bigger the screen size is better the user experience of reading and watching movie or video songs. (2.80 Inch vs. 2.4 Inch) |