|
Motorola Droid Razr M
|
VS |
Samsung Galaxy S Advance
|
|
|
VS |
|
| Best Price |
|
| Price |
Not Available |
|
Rs. 11,999.00 |
| Battery |
| Capacity |
2000 mAH, Li-ion
33.3% more mAH battery than Samsung Galaxy S Advance. More battery capacity reduces the need to charge your battery again. (2000 mAH, Li-ion vs. 1500 mAH, Li-ion)
|
|
1500 mAH, Li-ion
|
| TalkTime |
Up to 9 Hours(2G) / Up to 5.83 Hours(3G)
|
|
Up to 15 Hours(2G) / Up to 7.33 Hours(3G)
|
| Stand By Time |
Up to 707 Hours(2G) /Up to 830 Hours(3G)
|
|
|
| Camera |
| Main Camera |
8 MP, Auto focus
60.0% more mega pixels (MP) on main camera than Samsung Galaxy S Advance. More main camera resolution means better picture quality and detailed photos, which will look sharp on a large screen. (8 MP, Auto focus vs. 5 MP, Auto focus)
|
|
5 MP, Auto focus
|
| Front Camera |
0.3 MP
|
|
1.30 MP
333.3% more mega pixels (MP) on front camera than Samsung Galaxy S Advance. More front camera resolution means better selfies picture. Front facing cameras also used for video call on Skype (1.30 MP vs. 0.3 MP)
|
| Flash |
LED
|
|
LED
|
| Video Recording |
Full HD @ 30 FPS
|
|
1280x72
|
| Zoom |
Digital Zoom
|
|
Digital Zoom
|
| Camera Features |
Digital image stabilization, Face detection, Geo tagging, Touch to focus
|
|
Auto Focus
|
| Connectivity |
| Operating Frequency |
GSM 1800 / 1900 / 850 / 900 MHz UMTS 1900 / 2100 / 850 / 900 MHz
|
|
|
| GPRS |
Class 12, 32 - 48 kbps kbps
|
|
Class 12, 32 - 48 kbps kbps
|
| EDGE |
Class 12
|
|
Class 12
|
| 3G |
HSDPA 42.2 Mbit/s, HSUPA 5.76 Mbit/s
|
|
HSPA , EV-DO , Rev.A
|
| Wi-Fi |
Wi-Fi 802.11, a/b/g/n, Dual antennas, Mobile Hotspot
|
|
Wi-Fi 802.11, a/b/g/n, Mobile Hotspot
|
| Bluetooth |
v4.0, EDR, A2DP, Proximity Monitor Profile over LE
|
|
v3, A2DP
|
| USB Connectivity |
USB Port, microUSB 2.0, Micro HDMI (Type D)
|
|
No
|
| More Connectivity |
, Micro HDMI (Type D)
|
|
DLNA, VoIP
|
| Design |
| Touch Screen |
Capacitive Touchscreen, Multi-touch
|
|
Capacitive Touchscreen
|
| Weight |
126 grams
|
|
120 grams
6.0 grams Lighter than Samsung Galaxy S Advance. light weight phone is easy to hold and can kept in your pocket for long time. (120 grams vs. 126 grams)
|
| Dimensions |
122.5 x 60.9 x 8.30 mm
1.4 mm Thinner than Samsung Galaxy S Advance. Slim mobile phone is easy to handle and looks gorgeous in hand. (122.5 x 60.9 x 8.30 mm vs. 123.2 x 63 x 9.7 mm)
|
|
123.2 x 63 x 9.7 mm
|
| Screen Size |
4.3 Inch
7.5% bigger screen size than Samsung Galaxy S Advance. The bigger the screen size is better the user experience of reading and watching movie or video songs. (4.3 Inch vs. 4 Inch)
|
|
4 Inch
|
| Colours |
Black,White
|
|
Black,White
|
| Display |
| Screen Resolution |
540 x 960 pixels
|
|
480 x 800 pixels
|
| Pixel Density (sharpness) |
256 ppi
9.9% Higher pixel density than Samsung Galaxy S Advance. High pixel density shows sharper text and extremely detailed photos and videos. (256 ppi vs. 233 ppi)
|
|
233 ppi
|
| Display Type |
Super AMOLED
|
|
Super AMOLED
|
| Features |
| Screen Protection |
Corning Gorilla Glass
|
|
|
| Box Contents |
Handset, Battery, Charger, Earphone, USB Cable, User Manual, Warranty Card
|
|
Handset, Battery, Charger, Earphone, USB Cable, User Manual, Warranty Card
|
| Sensors |
Accelerometer, Compass, Proximity sensor
|
|
Accelerometer, Proximity sensor, Compass, Gyroscope
|
| Applications |
Document Viewer/Editor
|
|
Document Editor (Word, Excel, PowerPoint, PDF)
|
| GPS |
with A-GPS
|
|
with A-GPS
|
| General |
| Brand |
Motorola
|
|
Samsung
|
| Model |
RAZR M
|
|
Galaxy S Advance
|
| Operating System |
Android v4.0.4 (Ice Cream Sandwich)
|
|
Android v2.3 (Gingerbread)
|
| SIM Slot(s) |
Single SIM, GSM
|
|
Single SIM, GSM
|
| SIM Size |
Micro
|
|
|
| OS Type |
Android
|
|
Android
|
| Multimedia |
| FM Radio |
No
|
|
Stereo FM, RDS
|
| Loudspeaker |
Yes
|
|
|
| Audio Jack |
3.5 mm
|
|
|
| Performance |
| Processor |
Dual core, 1.5 GHz, Chipset: Qualcomm MSM8960 Snapdragon
|
|
Dual core, 1 GHz, Chipset: Cortex A9
|
| RAM |
1 GB
33.3% More RAM memory than Samsung Galaxy S Advance. more RAM makes your mobile significantly faster and efficient. (1 GB vs. 768 MB)
|
|
768 MB
|
| Storage |
| Internal Memory |
8 GB
|
|
2 GB
|
| Expandable Memory |
Up to 32 GB
|
|
Up to 32 GB
|
|
|
| Price Comparison |
|
Compare Price
|
|
Compare Price
|