Top 3 Reasons for Micromax X290 Compared to Micromax GC333 1.3 mm Thinner than Micromax GC333. Slim mobile phone is easy to handle and looks gorgeous in hand. (113.5 x 49.6 x 14.35 mm vs. 114.5 x 47 x 15.60 mm) 9.1% bigger screen size than Micromax GC333. The bigger the screen size is better the user experience of reading and watching movie or video songs. (2.40 Inch vs. 2.20 Inch) 30.5% Higher pixel density than Micromax GC333. High pixel density shows sharper text and extremely detailed photos and videos. (167 ppi vs. 128 ppi) |
Top 2 Reasons for Micromax GC333 Compared to Micromax X290 76.5% more mAH battery than Micromax GC333. More battery capacity reduces the need to charge your battery again. (1500 mAH, Li-ion vs. 850 mAH, Li-ion) 6.0 grams Lighter than Micromax GC333. light weight phone is easy to hold and can kept in your pocket for long time. (80 grams vs. 86 grams) |