5.9% more mAH battery than Micromax X264. More battery capacity reduces the need to charge your battery again. (900 mAH, Li-ion vs. 850 mAH, Li-ion)
1.7 mm Thinner than Micromax X264. Slim mobile phone is easy to handle and looks gorgeous in hand. (118 x 49 x 14.3 mm vs. 105 x 46 x 16 mm)
33.3% bigger screen size than Micromax X264. The bigger the screen size is better the user experience of reading and watching movie or video songs. (2.40 Inch vs. 1.8 Inch)
46.5% Higher pixel density than Micromax X264. High pixel density shows sharper text and extremely detailed photos and videos. (167 ppi vs. 114 ppi)
Compare Price