Top 3 Reasons for Micromax Q75 Compared to GFive U898 41.2% more mAH battery than GFive U898. More battery capacity reduces the need to charge your battery again. (1200 mAH, Li-ion vs. 850 mAH, Li-ion) 1.3 mm Thinner than GFive U898. Slim mobile phone is easy to handle and looks gorgeous in hand. (115 x 64.5 x 12.20 mm vs. 108.2 x 45.95 x 13.50 mm) 9.1% bigger screen size than GFive U898. The bigger the screen size is better the user experience of reading and watching movie or video songs. (2.4 Inch vs. 2.2 Inch) |
Top 1 Reasons for GFive U898 Compared to Micromax Q75 9.0% Higher pixel density than GFive U898. High pixel density shows sharper text and extremely detailed photos and videos. (182 ppi vs. 167 ppi) |