16.7% more mAH battery than Micromax X264. More battery capacity reduces the need to charge your battery again. (1050 mAH, Li-ion vs. 900 mAH, Li-ion)
1.3 mm Thinner than Micromax X264. Slim mobile phone is easy to handle and looks gorgeous in hand. (111 x 58 x 13 mm vs. 118 x 49 x 14.3 mm)
9.1% bigger screen size than Micromax X264. The bigger the screen size is better the user experience of reading and watching movie or video songs. (2.40 Inch vs. 2.20 Inch)
9.0% Higher pixel density than Micromax X264. High pixel density shows sharper text and extremely detailed photos and videos. (182 ppi vs. 167 ppi)
Compare Price