11.1% more mAH battery than Micromax X264. More battery capacity reduces the need to charge your battery again. (1000 mAH, Li-ion vs. 900 mAH, Li-ion)
2.7 mm Thinner than Micromax X264. Slim mobile phone is easy to handle and looks gorgeous in hand. (120 x 52 x 11.60 mm vs. 118 x 49 x 14.3 mm)
8.3% bigger screen size than Micromax X264. The bigger the screen size is better the user experience of reading and watching movie or video songs. (2.60 Inch vs. 2.40 Inch)
8.4% Higher pixel density than Micromax X264. High pixel density shows sharper text and extremely detailed photos and videos. (167 ppi vs. 154 ppi)
Compare Price