> > Maxx MX52e Play vs. FLY MC202

Compare Maxx MX52e Play vs. FLY MC202

Maxx MX52e Play
 		VS
FLY MC202
VS
Best Price
Price Rs. 1,317.00 Rs. 1,040.00
Battery
Capacity 1000 mAH, Li-ion 1800 mAH, Li-ion

80.0% more mAH battery than FLY MC202. More battery capacity reduces the need to charge your battery again. (1800 mAH, Li-ion vs. 1000 mAH, Li-ion)
TalkTime Up to 3 Hours(2G) Up to 15 Hours(2G)
Stand By Time Up to 400 Hours(2G) Up to 15 Hours(2G)
Camera
Main Camera 1.3 MP 1.3 MP
Zoom Digital Zoom Digital Zoom
Camera Features Smile detection, Scenes, Continuos Shooting, Multi Shot
Connectivity
EDGE No
3G EV-DO , Rev.A
Operating Frequency GSM 1800 / 900 MHz | GSM 1800 / 900 MHz
GPRS Yes Yes
Bluetooth Yes
USB Connectivity USB Port, miniUSB USB Port
Design
Weight 84.4 grams 55.8 grams

28.6 grams Lighter than FLY MC202. light weight phone is easy to hold and can kept in your pocket for long time. (55.8 grams vs. 84.4 grams)
Dimensions 118.38 x 48.81 x 13.21 mm

3.3 mm Thinner than FLY MC202. Slim mobile phone is easy to handle and looks gorgeous in hand. (118.38 x 48.81 x 13.21 mm vs. 114 x 46 x 16.50 mm)

 114 x 46 x 16.50 mm
Screen Size 2.4 Inch

20.0% bigger screen size than FLY MC202. The bigger the screen size is better the user experience of reading and watching movie or video songs. (2.4 Inch vs. 2 Inch)

 2 Inch
Colours Black,Blue,Red,Yellow Black with Red
Display
Screen Resolution 240 x 320 pixels 120 x 160 pixels
Pixel Density (sharpness) 167 ppi

67.0% Higher pixel density than FLY MC202. High pixel density shows sharper text and extremely detailed photos and videos. (167 ppi vs. 100 ppi)

 100 ppi
Display Type TFT LCD
Features
Box Contents Handset, Battery, Charger, Earphone, User Manual, Warranty Card Handset, Battery, Charger, Earphone, User Manual, Warranty Card
General
Brand Maxx Fly
Model MX52e Play MC202
SIM Slot(s) Dual SIM, GSM+GSM Dual SIM, GSM+GSM
Multimedia
FM Radio Yes Internal antenna
Storage
Expandable Memory Up to 8 GB Up to 32 GB
Price Comparison

Compare Price

Compare Price

Others Related Comparisons