66.7% more mAH battery than Micromax X264. More battery capacity reduces the need to charge your battery again. (1500 mAH, Li-ion vs. 900 mAH, Li-ion)
2.8 mm Thinner than Micromax X264. Slim mobile phone is easy to handle and looks gorgeous in hand. (124.2 x 57.4 x 11.5 mm vs. 118 x 49 x 14.3 mm)
16.7% bigger screen size than Micromax X264. The bigger the screen size is better the user experience of reading and watching movie or video songs. (2.8 Inch vs. 2.40 Inch)
16.8% Higher pixel density than Micromax X264. High pixel density shows sharper text and extremely detailed photos and videos. (167 ppi vs. 143 ppi)
Compare Price