> > Maxx MQ340 vs. Micromax Q3 ezpad

Compare Maxx MQ340 vs. Micromax Q3 ezpad

Maxx MQ340
VS
Micromax Q3 ezpad
VS
Best Price
Price Not Available Not Available
Battery
Capacity 1450 mAH, Li-ion

45.0% more mAH battery than Micromax Q3 ezpad. More battery capacity reduces the need to charge your battery again. (1450 mAH, Li-ion vs. 1000 mAH, Li-ion)

1000 mAH, Li-ion
TalkTime Up to 6 Hours(2G) Up to 4 Hours(2G)
Stand By Time Up to 4 Hours(2G)
Camera
Main Camera 0.3 MP 1.3 MP

333.3% more mega pixels (MP) on main camera than Micromax Q3 ezpad. More main camera resolution means better picture quality and detailed photos, which will look sharp on a large screen. (1.3 MP vs. 0.3 MP)

Video Recording Recording Formats: MPEG-4, 3GP, AVI
Zoom Digital Zoom Digital Zoom
Camera Features Smile detection, White balance presets, Multi Shot Effects, Multi Shot
Connectivity
GPRS Yes Class 10, 32 - 48 kbps kbps
EDGE No No
Bluetooth Yes
USB Connectivity USB Port USB Port
Design
Screen Size 2 Inch 2.2 Inch

10.0% bigger screen size than Micromax Q3 ezpad. The bigger the screen size is better the user experience of reading and watching movie or video songs. (2.2 Inch vs. 2 Inch)

Weight 97 grams
Dimensions 111.2 x 61.2 x 13 mm
Colours Yellow Black
Display
Screen Resolution 240 x 320 pixels 176 x 220 pixels
Pixel Density (sharpness) 200 ppi

56.3% Higher pixel density than Micromax Q3 ezpad. High pixel density shows sharper text and extremely detailed photos and videos. (200 ppi vs. 128 ppi)

128 ppi
Display Type LCD LCD
Features
Box Contents Handset, Battery, Travel Charger, Earphone, Warranty Card, Data Cable, Memory Card Transceiver, Standard Charger, Standard Battery, Handsfree Kit, Leather Pouch, Service Guide, User Guide, Warranty Card
General
Brand Maxx Micromax
Model MQ 340 Q3 ezpad
SIM Slot(s) Dual SIM, GSM+GSM Dual SIM, GSM+GSM
Multimedia
FM Radio Scheduled FM Recording Stereo FM, Recording option
Storage
Expandable Memory Up to 2 GB Up to 2 GB
Internal Memory 10 MB
Price Comparison

Compare Price

Compare Price

Others Related Comparisons