Top 3 Reasons for Malata QS502 Compared to Micromax X50 11.1% more mAH battery than Micromax X50. More battery capacity reduces the need to charge your battery again. (1000 mAH, Li-ion vs. 900 mAH, Li-ion) 2.5 grams Lighter than Micromax X50. light weight phone is easy to hold and can kept in your pocket for long time. (110.5 grams vs. 113 grams) 3.0 mm Thinner than Micromax X50. Slim mobile phone is easy to handle and looks gorgeous in hand. (110 x 58.5 x 12.80 mm vs. 117.7 x 52.7 x 15.80 mm) |
Top 1 Reasons for Micromax X50 Compared to Malata QS502 42.7% Higher pixel density than Micromax X50. High pixel density shows sharper text and extremely detailed photos and videos. (167 ppi vs. 117 ppi) |