Top 2 Reasons for Konka W200 Compared to Micromax C210 1.5 mm Thinner than Micromax C210. Slim mobile phone is easy to handle and looks gorgeous in hand. (108.5 x 55.5 x 13.50 mm vs. 115 x 46.8 x 14.95 mm) 18.5% Higher pixel density than Micromax C210. High pixel density shows sharper text and extremely detailed photos and videos. (141 ppi vs. 119 ppi) |
Top 1 Reasons for Micromax C210 Compared to Konka W200 18.0% bigger screen size than Micromax C210. The bigger the screen size is better the user experience of reading and watching movie or video songs. (2.36 Inch vs. 2 Inch) |