Top 5 Reasons for Micromax X367 Compared to G-Tide G666 12.5% more mAH battery than Micromax X367. More battery capacity reduces the need to charge your battery again. (900 mAH, Li-ion vs. 800 mAH, Li-ion) 4.0 mm Thinner than Micromax X367. Slim mobile phone is easy to handle and looks gorgeous in hand. (107 x 58 x 11 mm vs. 101 x 49.9 x 15 mm) 16.7% bigger screen size than Micromax X367. The bigger the screen size is better the user experience of reading and watching movie or video songs. (2.80 Inch vs. 2.4 Inch) 22.2% Higher pixel density than Micromax X367. High pixel density shows sharper text and extremely detailed photos and videos. (143 ppi vs. 117 ppi) 100.0% More RAM memory than Micromax X367. more RAM makes your mobile significantly faster and efficient. (64 MB vs. 32 MB) |