81.8% more mAH battery than Micromax Q3 ezpad. More battery capacity reduces the need to charge your battery again. (1000 mAH, Li-ion vs. 550 mAH, Li-ion)
2.0 mm Thinner than Micromax Q3 ezpad. Slim mobile phone is easy to handle and looks gorgeous in hand. (111.2 x 61.2 x 13 mm vs. 103 x 43.5 x 15 mm)
46.7% bigger screen size than Micromax Q3 ezpad. The bigger the screen size is better the user experience of reading and watching movie or video songs. (2.2 Inch vs. 1.5 Inch)
5.8% Higher pixel density than Micromax Q3 ezpad. High pixel density shows sharper text and extremely detailed photos and videos. (128 ppi vs. 121 ppi)
Compare Price