Top 1 Reasons for Coolpad 8166 Compared to Micromax GC700 59.6% more mAH battery than Micromax GC700. More battery capacity reduces the need to charge your battery again. (1500 mAH, Li-ion vs. 940 mAH, Li-ion) |
Top 3 Reasons for Micromax GC700 Compared to Coolpad 8166 53.8% more mega pixels (MP) on main camera than Micromax GC700. More main camera resolution means better picture quality and detailed photos, which will look sharp on a large screen. (2 MP vs. 1.3 MP) 68.0 grams Lighter than Micromax GC700. light weight phone is easy to hold and can kept in your pocket for long time. (82 grams vs. 150 grams) 6.0 mm Thinner than Micromax GC700. Slim mobile phone is easy to handle and looks gorgeous in hand. (117 x 52 x 15 mm vs. 116 x 54 x 21 mm) |