> > Blackberry Pearl Flip 8230 vs. Samsung SCH-U340

Compare Blackberry Pearl Flip 8230 vs. Samsung SCH-U340

Blackberry Pearl Flip 8230
VS
Samsung SCH-U340

Top 2 Reasons for Blackberry Pearl Flip 8230 Compared to Samsung SCH-U340

566.7% more mega pixels (MP) on main camera than Samsung SCH-U340. More main camera resolution means better picture quality and detailed photos, which will look sharp on a large screen. (2 MP vs. 0.3 MP)

3.0 mm Thinner than Samsung SCH-U340. Slim mobile phone is easy to handle and looks gorgeous in hand. (101 x 50 x 17.50 mm vs. 89 x 46 x 20.50 mm)

VS

Top 2 Reasons for Samsung SCH-U340 Compared to Blackberry Pearl Flip 8230

11.1% more mAH battery than Samsung SCH-U340. More battery capacity reduces the need to charge your battery again. (1000 mAH, Li-ion vs. 900 mAH, Li-ion)

11.0 grams Lighter than Samsung SCH-U340. light weight phone is easy to hold and can kept in your pocket for long time. (91 grams vs. 102 grams)

Best Price
Price Not Available Not Available
Battery
Capacity 900 mAH, Li-ion 1000 mAH, Li-ion
TalkTime Up to 3.5 Hours(2G) Up to 3.5 Hours(2G)
Stand By Time Up to 5 Hours(2G) Up to 5 Hours(2G)
Camera
Main Camera 2 MP 0.3 MP
Flash ,LED
Zoom Digital Zoom Digital Zoom
Camera Features Smile detection, White balance presets, Multi Shot Smile detection, Effects, Multi Shot
Connectivity
GPRS No Yes
EDGE No No
Bluetooth v2.0 No
USB Connectivity No No
Design
Weight 102 grams 91 grams
Dimensions 101 x 50 x 17.50 mm 89 x 46 x 20.50 mm
Colours Black,Silver,Pink
Screen Size 2.6 Inch
Display
Screen Resolution 240 x 320 pixels 128 x 160 pixels
Pixel Density (sharpness) 154 ppi
Display Type LCD
Features
Box Contents Handset, Battery, Charger, Earphone, USB Cable, User Manual, Warranty Card Mobile, Battery, Charger, Headset, User Manual
GPS Yes
General
Brand Blackberry Samsung
Model Pearl Flip 8230 SCH-U340
SIM Slot(s) Single SIM, CDMA Single SIM, CDMA
Performance
RAM 128 MB
Storage
Internal Memory 128 MB
Expandable Memory Yes No
Price Comparison

Compare Price

Compare Price

Others Related Comparisons