|
Apple iPhone 5c CDMA 16GB
|
VS |
Motorola Moto X (Wood Back)
|
|
|
VS |
|
| Best Price |
|
| Price |
Not Available |
|
Rs. 12,790.00 |
| Battery |
| TalkTime |
Up to 10 Hours(3G)
|
|
Up to 13 Hours(2G)
|
| Stand By Time |
Up to 250 Hours(2G) /Up to 250 Hours(3G)
|
|
Up to 576 Hours(2G)
|
| Capacity |
|
|
2200 mAH, Li-ion
|
| Camera |
| Main Camera |
8 MP, Auto focus
|
|
10 MP, Auto focus
25.0% more mega pixels (MP) on main camera than Motorola Moto X (Wood Back). More main camera resolution means better picture quality and detailed photos, which will look sharp on a large screen. (10 MP, Auto focus vs. 8 MP, Auto focus)
|
| Front Camera |
1.2 MP
|
|
2 MP
66.7% more mega pixels (MP) on front camera than Motorola Moto X (Wood Back). More front camera resolution means better selfies picture. Front facing cameras also used for video call on Skype (2 MP vs. 1.2 MP)
|
| Flash |
LED
|
|
LED
|
| Video Recording |
Full HD @ 30 FPS
|
|
Full HD @ 30 FPS
|
| Zoom |
Digital Zoom
|
|
Digital Zoom
|
| Camera Features |
Back-illuminated sensor (BSI), Face detection, Geo tagging, High Dynamic Range mode (HDR), Image Viewer, Simultaneous HD video and image recording, Touch to focus
|
|
Auto Focus
|
| Connectivity |
| Operating Frequency |
CDMA 1700/2100 / 1900 / 2000 / 800 MHz
|
|
GSM 1800 / 900 MHz UMTS 2100 MHz
|
| GPRS |
No
|
|
Yes
|
| EDGE |
No
|
|
Yes
|
| 3G |
Yes
|
|
Yes
|
| Wi-Fi |
Wi-Fi 802.11, a/b/g/n, Dual antennas, Mobile Hotspot
|
|
Wi-Fi 802.11, a/ac/b/g/n, Dual antennas, Mobile Hotspot
|
| Bluetooth |
v4.0, A2DP
|
|
v4.0, EDR, A2DP
|
| USB Connectivity |
USB Port, USB 2.0
|
|
USB Port, USB Host, microUSB 2.0
|
| 4G |
|
|
Yes (doesn't support Indian bands)
|
| More Connectivity |
|
|
DLNA
|
| Design |
| Colours |
Black,Green,Pink,White,Yellow
|
|
Black,White
|
| Touch Screen |
Capacitive Touchscreen, Multi-touch
|
|
Capacitive Touchscreen, Multi-touch
|
| Weight |
132 grams
|
|
130 grams
2.0 grams Lighter than Motorola Moto X (Wood Back). light weight phone is easy to hold and can kept in your pocket for long time. (130 grams vs. 132 grams)
|
| Dimensions |
124.4 x 59.2 x 9 mm
1.4 mm Thinner than Motorola Moto X (Wood Back). Slim mobile phone is easy to handle and looks gorgeous in hand. (124.4 x 59.2 x 9 mm vs. 129.3 x 65.3 x 10.4 mm)
|
|
129.3 x 65.3 x 10.4 mm
|
| Screen Size |
4.0 Inch
|
|
4.7 Inch
17.5% bigger screen size than Motorola Moto X (Wood Back). The bigger the screen size is better the user experience of reading and watching movie or video songs. (4.7 Inch vs. 4.0 Inch)
|
| Display |
| Screen Resolution |
640 x 1136 pixels
|
|
HD (720 x 1280 pixels)
|
| Pixel Density (sharpness) |
326 ppi
4.5% Higher pixel density than Motorola Moto X (Wood Back). High pixel density shows sharper text and extremely detailed photos and videos. (326 ppi vs. 312 ppi)
|
|
312 ppi
|
| Display Type |
IPS LCD
|
|
AMOLED
|
| Graphics |
|
|
Adreno 320
|
| Features |
| Screen Protection |
|
|
Corning Gorilla Glass
|
| Box Contents |
iPhone 5c with iOS 7, Apple EarPods with Remote and Mic, Lightning to USB Cable, 5W USB Power Adapter, Warranty Card
|
|
Handset, Battery, Charger, Earphone, USB Cable, User Manual, Warranty Card
|
| Sensors |
Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light sensor, Proximity sensor
|
|
Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Proximity sensor
|
| Applications |
AirDrop file sharing, Siri natural language commands and dictation, iCloud cloud service, iBooks PDF reader
|
|
|
| GPS |
with A-GPS, Glonass
|
|
with A-GPS, GPS
|
| General |
| Brand |
Apple
|
|
Motorola
|
| Model |
iPhone 5c CDMA 16GB
|
|
Moto X (Wood Back)
|
| Operating System |
iOS v7
|
|
Android v4.2.2 (KitKat)
|
| SIM Slot(s) |
Single SIM, CDMA
|
|
Single SIM, GSM
|
| OS Type |
iOS
|
|
Android
|
| SIM Size |
|
|
Nano
|
| Multimedia |
| FM Radio |
No
|
|
|
| Loudspeaker |
Yes
|
|
Yes
|
| Audio Jack |
3.5 mm
|
|
3.5 mm
|
| Performance |
| Processor |
Dual core, 1.3 GHz, Chipset: Apple A6X
|
|
Dual core, 1.7 GHz, Krait, Chipset: Qualcomm MSM8960 Snapdragon
|
| RAM |
1 GB
|
|
2 GB
100.0% More RAM memory than Motorola Moto X (Wood Back). more RAM makes your mobile significantly faster and efficient. (2 GB vs. 1 GB)
|
| Storage |
| Internal Memory |
16 GB
|
|
16 GB
|
| Expandable Memory |
No
|
|
No
|
|
|
| Price Comparison |
|
Compare Price
|
|
Compare Price
|